Abstract
Background
Disease course of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) has been extensively studied in non-Asian population; however, there are limited data in Asian population. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term disease course of non-radiographic axSpA in Asian patients and identify factors associated with progression to radiographic axSpA.
Methods
In this retrospective observational cohort study, 56 Korean patients newly diagnosed with non-radiographic axSpA between 2006 and 2015 were included. All patients fulfilled the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axSpA, and did not fulfil the radiological criterion of the 1984 modified New York criteria. Disease course was assessed by the rate of progression to radiographic axSpA. Factors associated with the risk of progression to radiographic axSpA were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.
Results
The mean age at baseline was 31.4±13.3 years, and 37 (66.1%) patients were men. Over a mean observation period of 8.4±3.7 years, 28 (50.0%) patients progressed to radiographic axSpA. In multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, the presence of syndesmophytes at diagnosis (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 4.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.54–13.15, p = 0.006) and active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at diagnosis (adjusted HR: 5.88, 95% CI: 2.05–16.82, p = 0.001) were significantly associated with a higher risk of progression to radiographic axSpA, whereas longer exposure to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) was significantly associated with a lower risk of progression to radiographic axSpA (adjusted HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.80–0.98, p = 0.022).
Conclusion
During long-term follow-up, a substantial proportion of Asian patients with non-radiographic axSpA progressed to radiographic axSpA. The presence of syndesmophytes and active sacroiliitis on MRI at the time of non-radiographic axSpA diagnosis were associated with a higher risk of progression to radiographic axSpA, while longer exposure to TNFis was associated with a lower risk of progression to radiographic axSpA.
Citation: Kwon OC, Kim Y-G, Park M-C (2023) Disease course of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: Data from a long-term retrospective observational cohort. PLoS ONE 18(6):
e0288153.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288153
Editor: Tamer I. Abo Elyazed, Beni-Suef University, EGYPT
Received: December 7, 2022; Accepted: June 20, 2023; Published: June 30, 2023
Copyright: © 2023 Kwon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: Oh Chan Kwon received grants from the Seyoung Association (SYH) research grant from Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital (2019-GNS-001). Yong-Gil Kim received grants from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021M3A9G1026605). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that primarily affects the axial skeleton leading to bony ankylosis of the sacroiliac joints and spine [1, 2]. The spectrum of axSpA encompasses both non-radiographic and radiographic axSpA, which are distinguished based on the structural damage of the sacroiliac joints on radiographs [1, 3]. Non-radiographic and radiographic axSpA have comparable disease burden, and similar responses to biologic agents, including tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) and interleukin-17A inhibitors (IL-17is) [4–8]. Differences between the two axSpA subsets have also been noted. Compared with radiographic axSpA, non-radiographic axSpA has a higher proportion of females and a lower rate of syndesmophyte formation over time [3].
Regarding disease course, studies have shown that 10–40% of patients with non-radiographic axSpA progress to radiographic axSpA over a period of 2–10 years [9–11]. While some patients with non-radiographic axSpA progress to radiographic axSpA over time, others do not and remain as non-radiographic axSpA [12]. Moreover, some patients with non-radiographic axSpA might even remit in the course of the disease [12, 13]. Given the varying disease course across patients, studies have assessed factors associated with progression from non-radiographic axSpA to radiographic axSpA: active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), smoking, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27 positivity, and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) are suggested as factors associated with progression to radiographic axSpA [10, 11, 14, 15]. Active sacroiliitis on MRI is associated with 2- to 50-fold higher risk of progression [11, 14, 15]. Smoking and HLA-B27 positivity are associated with 3.3-fold and 12.6-fold higher risk of progression, respectively [14]. Elevated CRP is associated with 3.65-fold higher risk of progression [10].
Although the disease course of non-radiographic axSpA has been extensively studied, the majority of the studies have been conducted in non-Asian countries [10, 11, 14–17]. Clinical features of non-radiographic axSpA vary among different ethnic populations. A cross-sectional study reported that Asian patients with non-radiographic axSpA are predominantly male, younger at disease onset, and have a higher positivity rate of HLA-B27 as compared with patients with non-radiographic axSpA from other regions [18]. The difference in clinical characteristics among different populations might be explained by varying distributions of HLA and other genetic factors [18]. Hence, it is likely that disease course of non-radiographic axSpA in Asian patients may also differ from that of non-Asian patients. However, data on disease course of non-radiographic axSpA in Asian patients are limited. A study from Korea described the disease course of non-radiographic axSpA in Asian patients. However, the observation duration was relatively short (median: 4 years) [19]. Data on disease course of Asian patients with non-radiographic axSpA over a longer-term follow-up are still lacking.
We hypothesized that the long-term disease course of non-radiographic axSpA in Asian patients may differ from that in non-Asian patients. To better understand the disease course of non-radiographic axSpA in Asian patients, we described the rate of progression to radiographic axSpA in Asian patients with non-radiographic axSpA during a long-term observation period. We also aimed to identify factors associated with progression.
Materials and methods
Study design, setting, sample size
We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study. Data were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records of the patients at a tertiary referral hospital in Seoul, South Korea. The sample size was determined according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria as follows. Inclusion criteria: (i) fulfilling the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) classification criteria for axSpA [20], and (ii) not fulfilling the radiological criterion of the 1984 modified New York criteria [21]. Exclusion criterion was follow up of less than a year.
Participants
In this study, 61 patients newly diagnosed with non-radiographic axSpA at a tertiary referral hospital in Seoul, South Korea, between January 2006 and December 2015, were retrospectively selected for inclusion in the study. All patients fulfilled the ASAS classification criteria for axSpA [20], and did not fulfil the radiological criterion of the 1984 modified New York criteria [21]. In all patients, radiographs were followed up every 2–3 years. The retrospective observation period was from the date of diagnosis of non-radiographic axSpA to the date when the last radiographs were taken (until December 2021), or the date when progression to radiographic axSpA was first detected, whichever occurred first. Patients who were followed up for less than a year (n = 5) were excluded. The remaining 56 patients with non-radiographic axSpA were included for the final analysis.
Issue of interest
The data analysis included covariates at the time of non-radiographic axSpA diagnosis, such as age, sex, symptom duration (time from symptom onset to diagnosis), smoking status (current smoker, yes or no), body mass index, HLA-B27 positivity, peripheral symptoms, uveitis, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel diseases, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), CRP level, sacroiliitis sum score, active sacroiliitis on MRI, and the presence of syndesmophytes. Based on the radiograph, sacroiliitis of each sacroiliac joint was graded according to the modified New York criteria [21]. The sacroiliitis sum score was calculated as the sum of the right and left sacroiliitis grades [10, 22]. The presence of syndesmophytes was determined from the cervical and lumbar spine radiographs. Radiographs were interpreted at the time of imaging by expert musculoskeletal radiologists.
The use of medications, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), sulfasalazine, methotrexate, TNFis, and IL-17is, during the observation period was taken into account. For NSAIDs, the ASAS NSAID intake score [23] was calculated. For TNFis and IL-17is, exposure durations were assessed.
Comparison
The patients were categorized into those who did not progress to radiographic axSpA and those who progressed to radiographic axSpA. Covariates mentioned above were compared between the two groups.
Ethics and end point
The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea, approved this study (IRB No: 3-2018-0283). Owing to the retrospective nature of this study, the requirement for informed consent was waived.
The study end point was progression to radiographic axSpA, which was determined based on follow-up radiographs of the sacroiliac joints in each patient. Patients, who newly fulfilled the radiological criterion of the 1984 modified New York criteria [21], were considered to have progressed to radiographic axSpA.
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables following normal or non-normal distributions were expressed as means ± standard deviation or medians (interquartile range), respectively. Categorical variables were expressed as numbers (%). For comparison between two patient groups, independent two sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used for continuous variables following normal or non-normal distributions, respectively. χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used for comparison of categorical variables. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with progression to radiographic axSpA. Univariable analysis was initially performed. Factors with p < 0.05 in the univariable analysis were included in the multivariable analysis. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Results
Patient characteristics and the rate of progression to radiographic axSpA
In this study, data from 56 patients with non-radiographic axSpA were analyzed. The mean observation duration of the patients was 8.4 ± 3.7 years. The mean age of the patients at baseline was 31.4 ± 13.3 years, and 37 (66.1%) patients were men. The median symptom duration was 2.3 (1.8–3.5) years. At baseline radiographs, the median value of the sacroiliitis sum score was 1.0 (0.0–2.0), and syndesmophytes were present in 8 (14.3%) patients. Active sacroiliitis was observed on MRI in 36 (64.3%) patients. Regarding medications, TNFis and IL-17is were used in 28 (50.0%) and 2 (3.6) patients, respectively. For patients who were exposed to TNFis, the median duration of TNFi exposure was 4.9 (3.3–9.7) years. Two patients were exposed to IL-17is, with exposure durations of 1.3 and 3.2 years, respectively. Detailed patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Of the 56 patients with non-radiographic axSpA, 28 (50.0%) patients had progressed to radiographic axSpA over 8.4 ± 3.7 years of follow-up.
Comparison of patients who did not progress to radiographic axSpA and those who did
Comparison of the baseline characteristics between the two groups are reported in Table 2. Compared with patients who did not progress to radiographic axSpA, those who progressed to radiographic axSpA more frequently had syndesmophytes at baseline (3.6% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.022), and active sacroiliitis on MRI at baseline (50.0% vs. 78.6%, p = 0.026). There were no significant differences in other covariates between the two groups.
Factors associated with progression to radiographic axSpA
The results of the Cox proportional hazard regression analysis are shown in Table 3. Univariable analysis showed that longer symptom duration (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–1.27, p = 0.018), presence of syndesmophytes at baseline (unadjusted HR: 4.70, 95% CI: 1.89–11.70, p = 0.001), and active sacroiliitis on MRI at baseline (unadjusted HR: 3.97, 95% CI: 1.54–10.23, p = 0.004) were significantly associated with a higher risk of progression to radiographic axSpA. In contrast, longer duration of exposure to TNFis (unadjusted HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.80–0.98, p = 0.014) was associated with a lower risk of progression to radiographic axSpA. However, when analyzed as a categorical variable (yes vs. no), TNFi usage (unadjusted HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.31–1.44, p = 0.303) was not significantly associated with a lower risk of progression to radiographic axSpA. In the multivariable analysis, symptom duration (adjusted HR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.95–1.19, p = 0.276) lost statistical significance, while the presence of syndesmophytes at baseline (adjusted HR: 4.50, 95% CI: 1.54–13.15, p = 0.006), active sacroiliitis on MRI at baseline (adjusted HR: 5.88, 95% CI: 2.05–16.82, p = 0.001), and TNFi exposure duration (adjusted HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.80–0.98, p = 0.022) remained as statistically significant.
Discussion
In this long-term observational study, we assessed the rate of progression to radiographic axSpA in Asian patients with non-radiographic axSpA. Progression to radiographic axSpA occurred in 50% of the patients with non-radiographic axSpA over a mean observation period of 8.4 years. We also found that presence of syndesmophytes and active sacroiliitis on MRI at diagnosis of non-radiographic axSpA are associated with a higher risk of progression to radiographic axSpA, whereas longer duration of TNFi exposure is associated with a lower risk of progression to radiographic axSpA. These findings are meaningful as they provide us better knowledge regarding the long-term disease course of non-radiographic axSpA in Asian patients, which has not been extensively studied as compared with that in non-Asian patients.
Although direct statistical comparison cannot be made, the progression rate of 50% over a mean observation period of 8.4 years is relatively higher than the rates reported by studies in non-Asian countries (10–40% over an observation period of 2–10 years) [9–11]. The higher progression rate in our study could be attributed to differences in clinical characteristics between Asian and non-Asian patients with non-radiographic axSpA. A previous study reported that Asian patients with non-radiographic axSpA were more frequently male (75.9% vs. 47.1%, p < 0.001), younger age at diagnosis (27.2 [21.1–39.6] years vs. 34.5 [27.7–41.7] years, p < 0.001), and had higher HLA-B27 positivity rate (90.6% vs. 61.9%, p < 0.001) than non-Asian patients with non-radiographic axSpA [18]. Similarly, patients in our study were predominantly male (66.1%), relatively young (mean age: 31.4 years), and had a high positivity rate of HLA-B27 (76.8%). These differences in characteristics between Asian and non-Asian patients with non-radiographic axSpA might have led to a more progressive disease course in Asian patients.
In the analysis of factors associated with progression to radiographic axSpA, the presence of syndesmophytes at diagnosis was associated with a 4.5-fold increase in risk of progression to radiographic axSpA (adjusted HR: 4.50). Studies have shown that the presence of syndesmophytes at diagnosis in patients with axSpA is associated with a 6- to 18-fold increased risk of radiographic spinal progression [24–26]. Our results suggest that the presence of syndesmophytes at diagnosis is also associated with a higher risk progression in the structural damage of the sacroiliac joints.
We also observed that active sacroiliitis on MRI at diagnosis is associated with approximately 6-fold increase in risk of progression to radiographic axSpA (adjusted HR: 5.88). This finding is consistent with studies from non-Asian countries, which reported active sacroiliitis on MRI as a factor associated with progression to radiographic axSpA [14–16]. On the other hand, the sacroiliitis sum score at diagnosis was not associated with the risk of progression to radiographic axSpA. Based on our findings, the presence of active inflammation in the sacroiliac joints at diagnosis, rather than structural change in the sacroiliac joints at diagnosis, seems to be a more reliable risk factor for progression to radiographic axSpA.
In our study, another factor associated with the risk of progression to radiographic axSpA was TNFi exposure duration. Longer TNFi exposure was associated with a lower risk of progression to radiographic axSpA (adjusted HR: 0.89), accounting for a 11% decrease in risk of progression per 1-year of exposure to TNFis. This finding is in line with studies suggesting that the use of TNFis may impede the progression of the radiographic structural damage of the sacroiliac joints [27–29]. However, in our analysis, when TNFi usage (yes vs. no) was analyzed without considering exposure duration, no significant association was observed between TNFi usage and the risk of progression to radiographic axSpA. This finding suggests that TNFi exposure duration is more important than TNFi usage itself, in terms of lowering the risk of progression to radiographic axSpA. Longer exposure to TNFis in patients with non-radiographic axSpA could contribute to a higher chance of remaining in a non-progressive disease.
This study has some limitations. First, as a retrospective study, bias resulting from unmeasured confounders could not be fully excluded. Second, the number of patients was relatively small. Only two patients were exposed to IL-17is, and we were unable to analyze whether the exposure duration to IL-17is was associated with the risk of progression to radiographic axSpA. As there are currently very limited data on the effect of IL-17is on the progression from non-radiographic axSpA to radiographic axSpA, further studies are required. Third, we lacked data on disease activity indices, such as the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [30] and the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [31] at diagnosis of non-radiographic axSpA. Active sacroiliitis on MRI, ESR, and CRP were considered as proxies of disease activity instead. Despite these limitations, our study is clinically significant as it provides important data on long-term disease course of non-radiographic axSpA and factors associated with progression to radiographic axSpA, specifically in Asian patients, which have been poorly studied to date.
Conclusion
In conclusion, in our cohort of Korean patients with non-radiographic axSpA, 50% of the patients progressed to radiographic axSpA over a mean observation period of 8.4 years, which is relatively higher than that in studies of patients from non-Asian countries. The presence of syndesmophytes and active sacroiliitis on MRI at diagnosis of non-radiographic axSpA were associated with a higher risk of progression to radiographic axSpA, whereas longer exposure to TNFis was associated with a lower risk of progression to radiographic axSpA. These data improve our understanding of the long-term disease course of non-radiographic axSpA as well as factors associated with disease progression in Asian patients.
References
- 1.
Sieper J, Poddubnyy D. Axial spondyloarthritis. Lancet. 2017;390: 73–84. pmid:28110981. - 2.
Park MC, Chung SJ, Park YB, Lee SK. Bone and cartilage turnover markers, bone mineral density, and radiographic damage in men with ankylosing spondylitis. Yonsei Med J. 2008;49: 288–294. pmid:18452267. - 3.
Inman RD. Axial Spondyloarthritis: Current Advances, Future Challenges. J Rheum Dis. 2021;28: 55–59. - 4.
Boonen A, Sieper J, van der Heijde D, Dougados M, Bukowski JF, Valluri S, et al. The burden of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015;44: 556–562. pmid:25532945. - 5.
Burgos-Varga R, Wei JC, Rahman MU, Akkoc N, Haq SA, Hammoudeh M, et al. The prevalence and clinical characteristics of nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis among patients with inflammatory back pain in rheumatology practices: a multinational, multicenter study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18: 132. pmid:27267875. - 6.
Braun J, Baraliakos X, Hermann KG, Landewé R, Machado PM, Maksymowych WP, et al. Effect of certolizumab pegol over 96 weeks of treatment on inflammation of the spine and sacroiliac joints, as measured by MRI, and the association between clinical and MRI outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. RMD Open. 2017;3: e000430. pmid:28848654. - 7.
Deodhar A, Blanco R, Dokoupilová E, Hall S, Kameda H, Kivitz AJ, et al. Improvement of Signs and Symptoms of Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis in Patients Treated With Secukinumab: Primary Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021;73: 110–120. pmid:32770640. - 8.
Deodhar A, van der Heijde D, Gensler LS, Kim TH, Maksymowych WP, Østergaard M, et al. Ixekizumab for patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (COAST-X): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;395: 53–64. pmid:31813637. - 9.
Protopopov M, Poddubnyy D. Radiographic progression in non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2018;14: 525–533. pmid:29774755. - 10.
Poddubnyy D, Rudwaleit M, Haibel H, Listing J, Märker-Hermann E, Zeidler H, et al. Rates and predictors of radiographic sacroiliitis progression over 2 years in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70: 1369–1374. pmid:21622969. - 11.
Wang R, Gabriel SE, Ward MM. Progression of Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis to Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68: 1415–1421. pmid:26663907. - 12.
Garg N, van den Bosch F, Deodhar A. The concept of spondyloarthritis: where are we now? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2014;28: 663–672. pmid:25488776. - 13.
Robinson PC, Wordsworth BP, Reveille JD, Brown MA. Axial spondyloarthritis: a new disease entity, not necessarily early ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72: 162–164. pmid:23100608. - 14.
Dougados M, Demattei C, van den Berg R, Vo Hoang V, Thevenin F, Reijnierse M, et al. Rate and Predisposing Factors for Sacroiliac Joint Radiographic Progression After a Two-Year Follow-up Period in Recent-Onset Spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68: 1904–1913. pmid:26990518. - 15.
Dougados M, Sepriano A, Molto A, van Lunteren M, Ramiro S, de Hooge M, et al. Sacroiliac radiographic progression in recent onset axial spondyloarthritis: the 5-year data of the DESIR cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76: 1823–1828. pmid:28684556. - 16.
Aydin SZ, Maksymowych WP, Bennett AN, McGonagle D, Emery P, Marzo-Ortega H. Validation of the ASAS criteria and definition of a positive MRI of the sacroiliac joint in an inception cohort of axial spondyloarthritis followed up for 8 years. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71: 56–60. pmid:21900284. - 17.
Costantino F, Zeboulon N, Said-Nahal R, Breban M. Radiographic sacroiliitis develops predictably over time in a cohort of familial spondyloarthritis followed longitudinally. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017;56: 811–817. pmid:28160002. - 18.
Kishimoto M, Ono K, Fukui S, Kawaai S, Deshpande GA, Yoshida K, et al. Clinical characteristics of non-radiographic versus radiographic axial spondyloarthritis in Asia and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis in other regions: results of the cross-sectional ASAS-COMOSPA study. RMD Open. 2021;7. pmid:34531305. - 19.
Jeong H, Kim YG, Kim TH, Kim TJ, Park MC, Seo MR, et al. Clinical characteristics of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: Results of the Korean Nonradiographic Axial SPondyloArthritis (KONASPA) data. Int J Rheum Dis. 2021;24: 1137–1147. pmid:34250745. - 20.
Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Listing J, Akkoc N, Brandt J, et al. The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68: 777–783. pmid:19297344. - 21.
van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27: 361–368. pmid:6231933. - 22.
Protopopov M, Sieper J, Haibel H, Listing J, Rudwaleit M, Poddubnyy D. Relevance of structural damage in the sacroiliac joints for the functional status and spinal mobility in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the German Spondyloarthritis Inception Cohort. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19: 240. pmid:29065931. - 23.
Dougados M, Simon P, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R, Maksymowych WP, Sieper J, et al. ASAS recommendations for collecting, analysing and reporting NSAID intake in clinical trials/epidemiological studies in axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70: 249–251. pmid:20829199. - 24.
Poddubnyy D, Haibel H, Listing J, Märker-Hermann E, Zeidler H, Braun J, et al. Baseline radiographic damage, elevated acute-phase reactant levels, and cigarette smoking status predict spinal radiographic progression in early axial spondylarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64: 1388–1398. pmid:22127957. - 25.
van Tubergen A, Ramiro S, van der Heijde D, Dougados M, Mielants H, Landewé R. Development of new syndesmophytes and bridges in ankylosing spondylitis and their predictors: a longitudinal study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71: 518–523. pmid:21989544. - 26.
Sari I, Lee S, Tomlinson G, Johnson SR, Inman RD, Haroon N. Factors Predictive of Radiographic Progression in Ankylosing Spondylitis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021;73: 275–281. pmid:31675169. - 27.
Dougados M, Maksymowych WP, Landewé RBM, Moltó A, Claudepierre P, de Hooge M, et al. Evaluation of the change in structural radiographic sacroiliac joint damage after 2 years of etanercept therapy (EMBARK trial) in comparison to a contemporary control cohort (DESIR cohort) in recent onset axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77: 221–227. pmid:28970213. - 28.
Rios Rodriguez V, Hermann KG, Weiß A, Listing J, Haibel H, Althoff C, et al. Progression of Structural Damage in the Sacroiliac Joints in Patients With Early Axial Spondyloarthritis During Long-Term Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Treatment: Six-Year Results of Continuous Treatment With Etanercept. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71: 722–728. pmid:30625261. - 29.
Torgutalp M, Rios Rodriguez V, Proft F, Protopopov M, Verba M, Rademacher J, et al. Treatment With Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors Is Associated With a Time-Shifted Retardation of Radiographic Sacroiliitis Progression in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis: 10-Year Results From the German Spondyloarthritis Inception Cohort. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;74: 1515–1523. pmid:35437900. - 30.
Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol. 1994;21: 2286–2291 pmid:7699630. - 31.
Lukas C, Landewé R, Sieper J, Dougados M, Davis J, Braun J, et al. Development of an ASAS-endorsed disease activity score (ASDAS) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68: 18–24. pmid:18625618.